Use Cases

Accounts Payable

Move invoice processing forward with automated comparisons and proposed coding, while keeping accountant review.

The problem

Invoice matching and repetitive coding consume hours that the finance team could use for more valuable work.

The existing process

Staff compare invoices with purchase orders and receipts, research prior GL coding, and prepare invoices for review.

The agent

The agent monitors AP email. For PO invoices, it compares the invoice, purchase order, and receipt. For non-PO invoices, it attempts GL coding using prior coding information and a growing knowledge base.

Human review

An accountant reviews the results. Suggested coding and invoice handling remain subject to human judgment.

The result

The implementation saves an estimated 10–15 employee hours per week.

This is an estimated labor-saving result from the existing implementation; results depend on the workflow and volume.

All use cases

See the sequence.

An illustration of the document comparison and human review steps. The accountant retains control.

00:10 · Illustrative sequence

AP invoice processing · Illustrative workflowInvoice received → compare invoice, PO & receipt → accountant review → ready for posting after approval.

One problem. A practical starting point.

What’s taking too much
of your team’s time?

Let’s find out where AI could make a difference.

Start Your Free AssessmentNo charge. No obligation.